Arguments for Kit Snicket being "bad":
* He's a member of VFD: VFD is a secret society that is directly involved in the conflict that brings misfortune to the Baudelaire orphans. While their intentions are good, their actions often have negative consequences.
* He's a "villain" in some books: In some books, Kit Snicket acts as a villain who tries to harm the Baudelaires, even if his motives are ultimately intended to protect them.
* He withholds information: Kit Snicket often hints at crucial information but never fully reveals it, leaving the Baudelaires and the reader frustrated.
* He's not a reliable narrator: The series is told from Kit Snicket's perspective, but he's unreliable. He can be biased and has a tendency to exaggerate or downplay certain events.
Arguments for Kit Snicket being "good":
* He genuinely cares for the Baudelaires: Despite his cryptic ways, Kit Snicket genuinely cares for the Baudelaires and wants to protect them.
* He's trying to fight a larger evil: Kit Snicket is fighting against Count Olaf and the forces of evil, even if his methods seem unconventional.
* He sacrifices himself for the Baudelaires: Ultimately, Kit Snicket sacrifices himself to help the Baudelaires escape Count Olaf and save themselves.
* He's a complicated character: Kit Snicket is a complex individual with his own flaws and motivations, making him a fascinating character to study.
Conclusion:
It's up to the reader to decide whether Kit Snicket is "good" or "bad". He's a morally ambiguous character who is both a hero and a villain, and his actions are both helpful and harmful. He's not simply black and white, but rather a complex, gray character who adds depth to the story.