Arts >> Movies & TV >> Film Production

Why did the movie industry reject Maxivision 48 1999 film projector which Roger Ebert said looked 4x better than normal image?

It seems you're referring to IMAX, not "Maxivision 48 1999". While IMAX certainly had an impact on the industry, it's not accurate to say it was "rejected". Here's why:

* IMAX wasn't "rejected": IMAX is still around today and a respected film format, used for both large-format documentaries and feature films.

* Technical challenges: The initial IMAX technology was costly and difficult to implement. It required dedicated theaters with specialized projectors and screens, making it a niche experience rather than a mainstream one.

* Limited appeal: IMAX was originally designed for large-format documentaries and special effects-heavy films. It wasn't ideal for standard feature films, which were already well-served by traditional film formats.

* Focus on digital: The rise of digital projection in the 2000s shifted the industry away from film altogether, with IMAX adapting its technology to digital formats as well.

Roger Ebert's comments: While Ebert was a staunch supporter of film and IMAX, his praise wasn't the deciding factor in the industry's adoption of the technology. He was a powerful voice, but the industry's decisions were based on practical considerations like cost, logistics, and market demand.

In summary: IMAX wasn't "rejected" by the industry but rather evolved alongside it. It faced technical challenges, had a limited appeal in its early days, and ultimately embraced digital technology to remain relevant in a changing landscape.

Film Production

Related Categories