The Poor:
* Most of the actors were likely from lower social classes. They were often apprentices, journeymen, or those who couldn't find other forms of employment.
* They were paid very little. Their wages were dependent on the success of the play, and they received a share of the profits, which could be meager.
* They often had to double and triple as different characters. This is why we have some famous examples of actors playing a wide range of roles, like the famous Richard Burbage, who played both Hamlet and King Lear.
The Rich:
* A few actors, often the most popular ones, could become quite wealthy. These were the star actors like Burbage, who were able to command higher wages and even own shares in the theatre.
* The shareholders and owners of the Globe Theatre were also likely wealthy. These were the investors who provided the capital to build and run the theatre, and they would reap the financial benefits of the success of the plays.
Important Note:
It's crucial to understand that the Globe Theatre's financial structure was designed to encourage a sense of community and shared success. Actors, shareholders, and the playwrights all had a stake in the success of the plays, which fostered a collaborative and entrepreneurial environment.
In summary:
While the Globe Theatre actors were diverse in their backgrounds, most of them were likely from lower social classes and struggled financially. However, a few talented actors achieved wealth and fame, making it possible for the theatre to attract some of the best talent of the time.