Here's a summary of their argument:
- Creon's Position: Creon argues that Antigone's actions were treasonous and disrespectful to the state's laws. He believes that she should be punished to uphold the authority and order of the city. He insists that his authority as the ruler must be respected, and anyone who disobeys his laws must face the consequences.
- Haemon's Counterargument: Haemon, Creon's son and Antigone's fiancé, disagrees with his father's decision. He argues that Creon's actions are harsh and unjust, and that the people of Thebes are against Creon's ruling. Haemon also questions the wisdom of punishing Antigone for her actions, as she was driven by love and devotion to her brother, Polynices. Haemon pleads with his father to reconsider his decision and spare Antigone's life, emphasizing the potential consequences of his actions and the importance of listening to the people's voice.
- The Conflict: Their disagreement stems from their differing perspectives on the importance of family loyalty versus state authority. Creon prioritizes the stability of the city and his authority, while Haemon emphasizes the importance of love, family ties, and the potential repercussions of Creon's actions on the people of Thebes.
Their argument highlights the tension between personal relationships and moral obligations, as well as the complexities of decision-making in times of conflict.