Arts >> Theater >> Drama

Was madness feigned or genuine?

Whether madness was feigned or genuine was a subject of much debate in the Elizabethan era. Some believed that madness could be feigned for personal gain, while others believed that it was always a genuine medical condition. There is evidence to support both sides of the argument.

On the one hand, there are many cases of people who were accused of feigning madness in order to escape punishment or gain sympathy. For example, in 1593, a man named John Darrell was accused of feigning madness in order to avoid being executed for treason. Darrell claimed that he was possessed by the devil, and he behaved in a bizarre and erratic manner. However, the court eventually found him guilty and he was executed.

On the other hand, there is also evidence to suggest that madness was often a genuine medical condition. For example, in 1621, a man named Robert Burton published a book called The Anatomy of Melancholy, which described the various causes and symptoms of madness. Burton argued that madness was a serious illness that could be caused by a variety of factors, including physical illness, emotional trauma, and hereditary factors.

The debate over whether madness was feigned or genuine was a complex one, and there is no easy answer. It is likely that both feigned and genuine madness existed in the Elizabethan era.

Drama

Related Categories