Is a voice recording admissible in court Kentucky if one of the parties that were recorded conversation can verify took place and identify who was present conversatio?

Yes, a voice recording is admissible in court in Kentucky if one of the parties to the recorded conversation can verify that it took place and identify who was present in the conversation. Under Kentucky law, a voice recording is considered hearsay, which is generally not admissible in court. Exceptions to the hearsay rule include evidence that falls within the excited utterance exception, present sense impression exception, dying declaration exception, and others as the court deems proper under the circumstances.

With respect to recorded conversations, Kentucky follows the "one-party consent rule," which means that only one of the parties to a conversation needs to consent to the recording in order for it to be admissible in court. Therefore, as long as one of the parties to the recorded conversation can verify that the recording took place and identify who was present in the conversation, the recording may be admissible in court.

However, it's important to note that the admissibility of evidence is ultimately determined by the judge presiding over the case, and they may consider other factors such as the context in which the recording was made, the authenticity of the recording, and any potential violations of privacy laws.