1. Right to a Fair Trial: The movie highlights the importance of the defendant's right to a fair and impartial trial. The defense attorney, Frank Galvin, argues that his client, Arthur Kauffman, has been deprived of this right due to the hospital's attempts to conceal evidence and pressure witnesses.
2. Right to Due Process: Kauffman's rights to due process and equal protection under the law are violated when the hospital engages in unethical practices and attempts to cover up the negligence that led to his injuries.
3. Right to Informed Consent: The hospital fails to obtain informed consent from Kauffman before performing the medical procedure that resulted in his injuries, violating his right to make informed decisions about his medical treatment.
4. Right to Access to Justice: Galvin faces numerous challenges and obstacles in pursuing justice on behalf of his client, highlighting the importance of equal access to the legal system for all individuals, regardless of their socioeconomic status or the power of the opposing parties.
5. Right to Privacy: The hospital's attempts to conceal evidence and manipulate the legal proceedings violate Kauffman's right to privacy and his expectation that his medical information would be kept confidential.
6. Right to Adequate Representation: Galvin struggles to provide effective representation to Kauffman due to his alcoholism and emotional state, raising questions about the defendant's right to adequate legal representation.
These are some of the key rights that are violated in the movie Verdict, reflecting the film's exploration of legal and ethical issues within the context of a medical malpractice lawsuit.