Here are some aspects where the film deviates from historical reality:
* Exaggerated heroism and individual feats: The film emphasizes the bravery and individual actions of a few soldiers, which may oversimplify the reality of the campaign. It downplays the contributions of many soldiers and the broader strategic context.
* Simplified portrayal of Japanese forces: The Japanese soldiers are presented as a monolithic force of ruthless and brutal enemies. In reality, they were individuals fighting under difficult circumstances, and their motivations were more complex than portrayed in the film.
* Dramatic license: The film takes dramatic license with certain events, such as the portrayal of the battle at Isurava and the Japanese commander's motivations.
* Specific historical details: Some details about the timeline, events, and characters may not be entirely accurate, such as the portrayal of the Japanese commander's death and the timeline of certain battles.
However, the film does capture some key aspects of the Kokoda Track Campaign:
* The harsh terrain and conditions: The film accurately depicts the brutal jungle environment and the difficult conditions endured by both sides.
* The importance of the Kokoda Track: The film highlights the strategic significance of the track and its role in the campaign.
* The Australian fighting spirit: The film shows the resilience, determination, and fighting spirit of the Australian soldiers.
* The contribution of indigenous Australians: The film recognizes the role of indigenous Australians in the campaign, particularly their use as trackers and their knowledge of the terrain.
Overall, "Kokoda" should be seen as a dramatic interpretation of the Kokoda Track Campaign, not a documentary. It offers a glimpse into the challenges and sacrifices of the campaign but should not be taken as a definitive historical account. To gain a deeper understanding of the historical events, it's important to consult various sources and historical accounts.