Arguments for Re-filming:
* Respect for Ledger's legacy: Some argue that re-filming would ensure that his performance is not exploited or diminished by future re-releases or spin-offs.
* Maintaining creative control: Re-filming could give the filmmakers the opportunity to adapt the character to the current cinematic landscape, potentially offering new insights or addressing criticisms of the original film.
* Technical advancements: Re-filming could take advantage of current visual effects and technologies, enhancing the scenes and potentially achieving a more immersive or realistic effect.
Arguments Against Re-filming:
* Respect for Ledger's performance: Many consider Ledger's performance iconic and irreplaceable. Re-filming would be disrespectful to his artistry and the powerful impact he achieved.
* Loss of authenticity: Re-filming would erase the unique circumstances and creative choices that contributed to the originality and power of Ledger's Joker.
* Unnecessary re-imagination: The film is already considered a masterpiece. Re-filming could create a sense of unnecessary retconning or revisionism that might diminish the original work's legacy.
Current Reality:
* Warner Bros. has stated they will not re-film Ledger's scenes. The studio has been sensitive to the legacy of "The Dark Knight" and has consistently chosen to honor Ledger's performance rather than replacing it.
* The use of CGI is unlikely. While CGI could potentially create a new version of the Joker, it would be a difficult and controversial undertaking.
Conclusion:
Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to re-film Heath Ledger's scenes is a complex one with no easy answers. It requires balancing respect for the actor's legacy with creative freedom and technical advancements. For now, it seems that the studio is committed to preserving Ledger's performance as it is, ensuring that his iconic portrayal of the Joker continues to be experienced by audiences worldwide.