Arguments in favor of judges deciding the results
* Judges are experts in the field. They have the knowledge and experience to evaluate the performances of the contestants and make informed decisions about who should win.
* Judges are impartial. They are not swayed by personal biases or popularity, and they can make objective decisions based on the quality of the performances.
* Judges can provide valuable feedback to the contestants. They can help the contestants identify their strengths and weaknesses and give them advice on how to improve their performances.
Arguments in favor of the audience deciding the results
* The audience is the ultimate consumer of the entertainment. They are the ones who decide what is popular and what is not, and they should have a say in who wins.
* The audience is more diverse than the judges. They represent a wider range of opinions and tastes, which can lead to a more inclusive and representative outcome.
* The audience can create a more exciting and engaging experience. When the audience is invested in the outcome of the contest, they are more likely to stay tuned and participate actively.
Ultimately, the decision of whether to have judges or the audience decide the results of talent contests is a matter of opinion. There is no right or wrong answer, and the best approach may vary depending on the specific contest.
Here are some factors to consider when making a decision:
* The nature of the contest. Is it a competition between professionals or amateurs? Is it focused on a specific skill or talent, or is it more open-ended?
* The size and composition of the audience. Is the audience large and diverse, or is it smaller and more specialized?
* The goals of the contest. Is the goal to find the best performer, or is it to promote a particular talent or skill?
By carefully considering these factors, contest organizers can make an informed decision about whether to have judges or the audience decide the results.