Riders can be a source of controversy, as they can lead to the passage of laws that would not otherwise have been approved. Critics argue that riders are undemocratic, as they can be used to bypass the normal legislative process. Supporters argue that riders are a necessary tool for legislators to compromise and pass legislation that would otherwise be impossible.
Here are some examples of riders on bills:
* In 2012, the United States Congress passed a bill that included a rider that prevented the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from regulating greenhouse gas emissions from new power plants.
* In 2015, the United Kingdom Parliament passed a bill that included a rider that legalized same-sex marriage.
* In 2017, the Australian Parliament passed a bill that included a rider that imposed a levy on foreign workers.
Riders can have a significant impact on the policies and laws of a country. They are a powerful tool for legislators to use to achieve their goals, but they can also be a source of controversy.