Here are some key questions Wood implicitly or explicitly asked through his experiments and observations:
On the nature and properties of N-rays:
* Are N-rays truly a form of radiation? Wood questioned the very existence of N-rays by testing their supposed properties. He showed that the effects attributed to N-rays could be observed even when the supposed source was absent or shielded.
* Are N-rays influenced by known physical properties? Wood investigated whether N-rays were affected by factors like light, magnetism, or electric fields. He found no correlation, further casting doubt on their legitimacy.
* Can N-rays be isolated and measured objectively? Wood challenged the subjective nature of N-ray detection. He emphasized the need for reproducible and objective methods for detecting and measuring N-rays.
On the experimental methods used by Blondlot:
* Is the methodology used to detect N-rays reliable and free from bias? Wood scrutinized Blondlot's experimental setup, pointing out potential flaws in the design and procedure.
* Are the results obtained by Blondlot reproducible under controlled conditions? Wood demonstrated that the observed effects could be manipulated or simply imagined, questioning the objectivity and reproducibility of Blondlot's findings.
* Do the reported effects of N-rays hold up under rigorous scientific scrutiny? Wood employed careful controls and variations in his experiments to expose the subjective and unreliable nature of N-ray observations.
Wood's questioning, coupled with his well-designed experiments, ultimately revealed the flawed nature of Blondlot's claims. He exposed the subjective bias and faulty methodology at the heart of the N-ray "discovery," helping to prevent the perpetuation of a scientific error.