Here's a breakdown of the contrasting elements:
Star Trek (2009 onwards):
* Action-heavy, blockbuster approach: Abrams' Star Trek reboot emphasized action sequences, visual effects, and a more modern, accessible aesthetic. This resonated with many viewers, but some felt it sacrificed the franchise's classic themes of exploration and philosophical pondering.
* Emphasis on origin story and character relationships: The reboot focused on the younger versions of the original crew members, reimagining their early days in Starfleet. This approach attracted new viewers but alienated some long-time fans who felt it didn't adequately capture the spirit of the original series.
* Mixed critical reception: The films garnered positive reviews for their visual spectacle and action sequences, but some critics felt they lacked the intellectual depth and character development of previous Star Trek installments.
Fringe:
* Mysterious, character-driven narrative: Fringe explored themes of science fiction, mystery, and conspiracy in a serialized format, allowing for complex character development and compelling storylines.
* Focus on emotional depth and character relationships: The show delved into the personal struggles and relationships of its characters, offering a deeper, more nuanced look at their lives and motivations.
* Critical acclaim and strong fan base: Fringe received widespread critical acclaim for its compelling writing, strong performances, and unique blend of science fiction and suspense. The show also developed a dedicated and passionate fan base, particularly those who appreciated its thought-provoking themes and character-driven stories.
Ultimately, Abrams' approach to both franchises reflected his strengths and weaknesses as a director and producer. While he excels at crafting visually stunning action sequences and creating engaging characters, some argue he can prioritize spectacle over substance. This is evident in the Star Trek reboot, where the focus on action and visual effects overshadowed the philosophical and intellectual aspects of the original series. Conversely, Fringe allowed him to explore more complex themes and character development, resulting in a more critically acclaimed and enduring success.
In conclusion, it's not fair to say that J.J. Abrams "made" Star Trek "so bad" and Fringe "great." Both franchises had their strengths and weaknesses, and both reflected Abrams' specific artistic choices and approaches to storytelling. Ultimately, individual preferences and interpretations contribute to the varied responses to these franchises.