While they lived in the same time period and shared a common cultural context, there isn't a clear and direct record of them having a shared opinion on "terror" itself. They likely engaged with the concept in different ways:
* Wordsworth: As a Romantic poet, Wordsworth was often drawn to the sublime and awe-inspiring aspects of nature, which could sometimes evoke feelings of terror. However, he also explored the beauty and tranquility found in the natural world. His work often focused on the power of the human spirit to endure and overcome challenges, including those that might be considered terrifying.
* Cruikshank: As a caricaturist, Cruikshank used his art to satirize and critique society. He often depicted the darker aspects of human nature, including violence, poverty, and injustice, which could be considered terrifying. However, his work also aimed to expose social ills and inspire reform.
To compare their views, you would need to examine their individual works:
* Wordsworth's poems: Look for poems that explore themes of nature, fear, the sublime, and the human spirit. Consider how he uses language and imagery to evoke feelings of terror or awe.
* Cruikshank's illustrations: Analyze his satirical cartoons and drawings, paying attention to the subjects he chooses, the way he depicts them, and the messages he conveys about society and its issues.
It's important to remember:
* Neither Wordsworth nor Cruikshank explicitly wrote about "terror" as a concept. We need to infer their opinions from their works.
* They may have held different views on "terror" depending on the context.
By carefully studying their individual works, you can develop your own interpretation of their views on the concept of terror.