Was King David real or is he mythological?

The historical existence of King David can't be confirmed with certitude as the only source referencing such figure remains the Bible. Despite his cultural significance, there's presently insufficient archeological grounds proving his reign. While many historians accept an actual David might've inhabited Jerusalem, his portrayal could've experienced embellishments, legends, and religious myths over time. The debate's complexity stems from this ambiguity, underscoring the distinction between historiography and faith-based accounts. Until further tangible evidence surfaces, the historicity of King David should be treated with cautious skepticism within academic contexts.