* Litigants are NOT compensated for the actual legal dispute. The shows aim to resolve real disputes, but the purpose is entertainment, not to replace the legal system. Think of it as a form of "binding arbitration" with a bit of flair.
* Compensation comes from the show's production. Litigants typically receive an appearance fee for their time on the show. The exact amount varies, but it's generally not a huge sum, especially compared to what they might receive from a legal victory.
* The legal process is expedited. The shows don't follow all the strict rules of a traditional courtroom. Evidence is often simplified, and the "judge" isn't a real judge.
* The "judge" is a retired judge or attorney. They're not employed by the court system but are hired by the show's producers. Their role is to act as a neutral arbiter and provide a binding decision based on the information presented on the show.
* The decisions are legally binding. While the "judge" is not a real judge, their rulings are legally binding, meaning the losing party must comply with the decision.
In essence, these shows offer an alternative form of dispute resolution that's entertaining, faster, and often cheaper than a traditional lawsuit. However, it's crucial to understand that the focus is on entertainment, not legal perfection.
If you're considering using a similar process for a real dispute, it's essential to seek legal advice from a qualified attorney to ensure you understand your rights and obligations.