What is phantom of the opera scenery criticism?

The Phantom of the Opera is a beloved musical that has been enjoyed by audiences for decades. However, the scenery of the show has been criticized for being too lavish and opulent. Some critics have argued that the scenery is distracting and takes away from the story. Others have said that the scenery is simply too expensive and that the money could be better spent on other aspects of the production.

One of the main criticisms of the Phantom of the Opera scenery is that it is too over-the-top. The sets are often very large and elaborate, and they feature a lot of moving parts. This can be visually distracting, and it can make it difficult for the audience to focus on the story. For example, the scene in which the Phantom takes Christine to his lair is particularly criticized for being too over-the-top. The set is a giant, underground cavern, and it is filled with all sorts of strange and fantastical creatures. This can be visually overwhelming, and it can make it difficult for the audience to follow what is happening.

Another criticism of the Phantom of the Opera scenery is that it is too expensive. The sets are very elaborate, and they require a lot of manpower and resources to build. This can add significantly to the cost of the production, and it can make it difficult for theaters to stage the show. For example, the Phantom of the Opera is one of the most expensive shows in Broadway history. The original production cost over $10 million to produce, and the sets alone cost over $1 million.

Despite these criticisms, the Phantom of the Opera remains a popular show. The scenery is often cited as one of the reasons why the show is so popular. The sets are truly stunning, and they help to create a magical and immersive experience for the audience.