Arguments for Gretel being a dynamic character:
* Shifting views on Bruno: At the beginning, Gretel is openly dismissive and critical of Bruno's friendship with Shmuel. However, she starts to show a slight shift in her perception of Bruno and his actions, even expressing a degree of concern when Bruno goes missing. This could be seen as a change in her attitude.
* Growing understanding of the world: Gretel, like Bruno, experiences the gradual revelation of the horrors of the concentration camp. This exposure, though limited, undoubtedly affects her view of the world and potentially leads to a degree of empathy for the prisoners.
* Developing maturity: The book doesn't explicitly explore Gretel's emotional development, but we see glimpses of her growing maturity through her interactions with Bruno, her curiosity about the camp, and her fear in the face of the unknown.
Arguments against Gretel being a dynamic character:
* Limited character arc: Gretel's change in perspective is subtle and not fully explored. Her internal struggle remains largely unseen, and her development is more implied than explicitly shown.
* Focus on Bruno: The story's primary focus is on Bruno, making Gretel's journey less central. This limits her opportunity for significant growth and change.
* Limited agency: Gretel is largely a passive observer in the story. Her actions are mostly reactions to Bruno's choices and her interactions with the camp. This lack of agency might be interpreted as limiting her dynamic potential.
Conclusion:
Whether Gretel is considered a dynamic character is subjective. While she shows hints of change, her development is not as clear-cut or as fully explored as Bruno's. Some readers might perceive her as dynamic, while others may see her as more static. The interpretation ultimately rests on the individual reader's perception of the character and her journey.