- Logic and reasoning: Brutus builds his argument by presenting logical reasons for Caesar's assassination, such as his alleged tyrannical ambitions and the threat he posed to the republic. He asks the audience to consider the merits of his arguments rather than being swayed by emotional appeals.
-Evidence and Proof: Brutus cites concrete evidence to support his claims against Caesar. He refers to specific instances where Caesar displayed arrogance and disregard for the democratic principles of the Roman Republic, such as rejecting the crown offered to him and dismissing the concerns of the Senate.
-Rhetorical Questions: Brutus uses rhetorical questions to challenge the audience to think critically about the consequences of Caesar's rule. He asks, "Who is here so base that would be a bondman? If any, speak, for him have i offended." By posing these questions, Brutus forces the audience to confront their own values and consider whether they would willingly accept servitude under a tyrannical ruler.
-Appeal to Shared Values: Brutus appeals to the audience's shared sense of patriotism and love for Rome. He reminds them of the sacrifices made by their ancestors to preserve the republic and warns against the dangers of allowing one person to accumulate too much power. By emphasizing the importance of preserving the republic's values and institutions, Brutus appeals to the audience's reason and sense of duty.