Arts >> Theater >> Drama

What are the perversions of court in The Crucible by Arthur Miller?

1. The use of hearsay evidence: Hearsay evidence is second-hand information, which is typically not allowed in court because it is unreliable. However, in the Salem witch trials, hearsay evidence was often used to accuse people of witchcraft, even though there was no real evidence to support the accusations.

2. The lack of due process: Due process is the legal right to a fair and impartial trial. In the Salem witch trials, due process was often disregarded, with people being denied the right to an attorney or the right to cross-examine their accusers.

3. The reliance on spectral evidence: Spectral evidence was the term used to describe the visions that some people claimed to have of witchcraft. These visions were often used to convict people of witchcraft, even though there was no scientific evidence to support their existence.

4. The use of torture: Torture was used to extract confessions from people accused of witchcraft. This was illegal, but it was still frequently used during the Salem witch trials.

5. The denial of basic human rights: People accused of witchcraft were often denied basic human rights, such as the right to food, water, and shelter. They were also often held in overcrowded and unsanitary conditions.

The perversions of court in The Crucible by Arthur Miller show how the legal system can be used to oppress and persecute innocent people.

Drama

Related Categories