The story is presented through the perspectives of multiple characters, each offering a different account of the events surrounding the murder of a samurai. These accounts are often contradictory, leaving the reader with a sense of ambiguity and uncertainty about the true nature of the crime and the identity of the perpetrator.
This ambiguity is intentional. Akutagawa's purpose is not to deliver a clear-cut whodunit but rather to explore the subjective nature of truth and the limitations of human perception.
Therefore, it is up to the reader to interpret the clues presented and draw their own conclusions about who is responsible for the murder. Some may find the evidence points towards the bandit, others towards the samurai's wife, and yet others might believe it was a combination of factors or even a completely different person.
The lack of a definitive answer is a key element of the story's effectiveness and its enduring legacy. It allows for a nuanced exploration of human nature, morality, and the complexities of truth.