The prosecution argued that Simpson used a knife to kill Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman, but no knife was ever recovered despite extensive searches. This absence of a murder weapon fueled speculation and debates among the public and legal experts.
Some believe that the lack of a murder weapon weakened the prosecution's case, while others argued that the circumstantial evidence was strong enough without it.
It's important to note that the absence of a murder weapon is not inherently conclusive evidence of innocence or guilt. However, it certainly played a role in the public's perception of the case and the jury's decision.