According to instrumental conceptualism, concepts are not fixed entities that accurately reflect an objective reality. Instead, they are seen as human inventions or constructions that serve specific purposes and provide a way to organize and make sense of experiences. Proponents of this view argue that the meaning and value of concepts lie in their ability to help us understand and manipulate the world around us, rather than in their correspondence to some external, absolute truth.
Instrumental conceptualism rejects the notion that there is one true or correct way of understanding the world and instead embraces multiple and diverse conceptual frameworks. It suggests that different concepts can be useful in different contexts and for different purposes, and that the "best" concept is the one that best suits a particular situation or task.
In essence, instrumental conceptualism values the practical implications and consequences of concepts over their metaphysical or epistemological foundations. It focuses on the pragmatic value of ideas and concepts, emphasizing their role in problem-solving, decision-making, and effective action in the real world.