Here are some points to consider:
Arguments for Battlefront (2015):
* Simpler, more focused gameplay: Many players preferred the straightforward, arcade-style gameplay of the original Battlefront. It felt more accessible and less complex than the later game.
* Stronger focus on iconic locations and characters: The original had a smaller but more curated selection of maps and heroes, often with deeper connections to the Star Wars universe.
* No loot boxes or microtransactions: This was a major advantage for the first game, as it felt less predatory than the later title, which was heavily criticized for its loot box system.
Arguments for Battlefront II (2017):
* Larger scale battles and more modes: The sequel offered more diverse maps, gameplay modes, and player counts, allowing for truly epic battles.
* More diverse hero roster: The hero roster was expanded significantly, adding more depth and variety to the hero-based gameplay.
* Improved graphics and sound: Battlefront II benefited from more powerful hardware and better visual fidelity.
* Improved story campaign: While not a central focus, the story campaign provided an engaging narrative experience.
Ultimately, which game is "better" depends on personal preferences and what aspects of the game are most important to the individual player.
To help you decide, consider:
* What kind of gameplay do you prefer? Arcade-style or more strategic and complex?
* What are your favorite Star Wars eras and locations?
* How important is a deep, engaging story campaign to you?
* How much do you care about microtransactions and loot boxes?
By considering these factors, you can decide which game is more suited to your tastes.