Does Expressionism want to make the inner experience of person objective?

Expressionism, as an artistic movement, doesn't aim to make the inner experience of a person objective in the traditional sense. Instead, it seeks to express subjective emotions and experiences in a powerful and often distorted way.

Here's why:

* Subjectivity is core: Expressionism rejects the idea of objective reality. It focuses on the artist's individual feelings, thoughts, and perceptions.

* Distortion and exaggeration: Expressionist art often uses bold colors, distorted forms, and exaggerated features to convey the artist's intense emotions.

* Emotional impact: The goal isn't to accurately represent reality, but to evoke a strong emotional response in the viewer.

So, while Expressionism doesn't make the inner experience objective, it does attempt to communicate it in a way that can be experienced and understood by others. The subjective experience is still central, but the art itself acts as a bridge between the artist's inner world and the viewer's.

Here are some examples of how Expressionism uses distortion to convey inner experience:

* Edvard Munch's "The Scream": The contorted figure, the swirling colors, and the disorienting background all contribute to a feeling of intense anxiety and existential dread.

* Ernst Ludwig Kirchner's "Street, Dresden": The elongated figures and sharp angles convey the alienation and unease of urban life in the early 20th century.

* Wassily Kandinsky's abstract paintings: These works use color and form to express abstract feelings and ideas, bypassing traditional representation altogether.

In conclusion, Expressionism doesn't aim to make the inner experience objective, but rather to subjectively communicate it in a way that can be felt and understood by others. It embraces distortion and exaggeration to create a powerful emotional impact and bridge the gap between the artist's internal world and the viewer's.