Here's why:
* Hus was influenced by John Wycliffe. Wycliffe, who greatly influenced Hus, believed in a form of predestination. He argued that God had predetermined who would be saved and who would be damned. This belief, however, was nuanced and did not necessarily imply that humans had no free will.
* Hus's own writings are ambiguous. Hus's own writings on the subject are open to interpretation. He focused more on the issues of sacramental theology, the authority of the Church, and the need for reform, rather than on the intricacies of predestination.
* Different interpretations exist. Some scholars believe Hus did accept a form of predestination similar to Wycliffe's, while others believe he did not. There is no clear consensus among historians.
It's important to note that:
* Hus's primary concerns were different from a strict focus on predestination. He was more focused on issues like the authority of the Church, the role of scripture, and the need for reform.
* The concept of predestination was complex and debated even within the Catholic Church. There were various interpretations of the doctrine.
In conclusion, while Hus was influenced by Wycliffe, his own writings on predestination are ambiguous. It's difficult to definitively say whether he believed in predestination in the same way as Wycliffe, and there are different interpretations among historians.