How do you think the speakers of these two poems would feel about each other?

It is difficult to say definitively how the speakers of these two poems would feel about each other, as their attitudes and opinions are not explicitly stated in the poems. However, we can make some inferences based on the tone and content of the poems.

The speaker of the first poem, "The Tyger," seems to be in awe of the tiger's power and beauty, and also seems to be contemplating the idea of God as the creator of such a magnificent creature. The speaker of the second poem, "The Lamb," seems to be more focused on the innocence and gentleness of the lamb, and uses the lamb as a symbol of Christ.

Based on these inferences, it is possible that the speakers of the two poems would have different perspectives on life and the world. The speaker of "The Tyger" may be more inclined to appreciate the power and majesty of nature, while the speaker of "The Lamb" may be more drawn to the gentleness and innocence of the divine. It is also possible that the speakers would find common ground in their appreciation of the beauty and wonder of the natural world.

Ultimately, it is up to the reader to decide how they think the speakers of these two poems would feel about each other. There is no one correct answer, and different readers may interpret the poems in different ways.