Plot:
- The movie condenses the storyline and omits certain subplots and characters from the book. For example, the film does not include the character of Beneatha's friend Joseph Asagai.
Ending:
- The book ends with the Younger family moving into the new house. Meanwhile, the movie ends with the family standing outside the house, symbolizing their hope and optimism for the future.
Walter Lee's Characterization:
- In the book, Walter is portrayed as a more complex and flawed character. The film, on the other hand, simplifies his character, making him more likable.
Ruth's Characterization:
- The movie places a greater emphasis on Ruth's role and perspective, giving her more prominence and agency in the story compared to the book.
Representation of the Younger Family:
- The film portrays the Youngers as a more united family, whereas the book delves into the tensions and conflicts between family members.
Symbolism:
- The significance of the plant symbolizes their desire for a better life in both the book and the film. However, the film places a stronger emphasis on this symbolism.
Social Commentary:
- Both the book and the movie offer social commentary on issues such as racism, poverty, and the pursuit of the American Dream. However, the film's social commentary is more subtle due to censorship concerns during the time of its production.
Characterization of Karl Lindner:
- In the book, Karl Lindner is depicted in a more nuanced manner, embodying the internal conflict of someone caught between racism and fairness. The film simplifies his portrayal, presenting him solely as a racist character.
Historical Context:
- As a product of its era, the movie downplays some aspects of the civil rights movement and activism prevalent at the time, which are more explicitly discussed in the book.
Overall, while staying true to the essence of the story, the movie adaption of A Raisin in the Sun takes creative liberties and alters certain elements of the original narrative and character development.