What are four reasons some scholars give for concluding that Shakespeare would not have written the plays?

1. Lack of evidence: There is no direct evidence linking Shakespeare to the plays. No manuscripts exist in his handwriting, and no contemporary documents mention him as the author.

2. Historical inaccuracies: The plays contain several historical inaccuracies, which some scholars believe Shakespeare would have avoided if he had been the author. For example, in Henry V, the Battle of Agincourt is depicted as taking place in 1415, when in reality it occurred in 1415.

3. Classical allusions: The plays contain many allusions to classical literature and mythology, which some scholars believe Shakespeare would not have been familiar with. For example, in Hamlet, the protagonist quotes from Seneca the Younger's play Thyestes.

4. Vocabulary: The plays contain a wide range of vocabulary, including many rare and obscure words. Some scholars believe that Shakespeare would not have had access to such a large vocabulary.

It is important to note that not all scholars agree with these arguments. Some believe that the evidence is sufficient to prove that Shakespeare was the author of the plays. Ultimately, the question of Shakespeare's authorship is a matter of debate.