Here's a breakdown:
* Historical Context: In the past, monarchs were considered to be the ultimate authority in their kingdoms. Their power was absolute, and they were seen as the "sovereign" ruler. The people living within their realm were considered their "subjects," meaning they were under the monarch's rule and authority.
* Legal Context: While the modern concept of "subjects" might seem outdated, the legal concept of "subjects" still exists in some monarchies. In the UK, for example, the Queen is the head of state, and the citizens are legally her "subjects." However, in practice, this term is rarely used, and the Queen's authority is limited by a constitutional framework.
* Symbolic Meaning: Even if not used in a strictly legal sense, the term "subject" can still hold symbolic meaning. It signifies a shared identity and sense of belonging within the realm. It also reflects the historical legacy of the monarchy and the unique relationship between the monarch and their people.
It's important to note that the term "subject" can be perceived as outdated or even condescending in modern times. This is because it implies a hierarchical relationship between the monarch and their people. However, many people still use the term "subject" to refer to citizens of a monarchy, particularly in the UK.