* He represents British Imperialism: The narrator is a British police officer in Burma, a colonized country. His presence itself is a symbol of the oppressive British rule. The locals resent him for his power and authority, which are seen as unjust and exploitative.
* He feels conflicted and powerless: Despite his position of authority, the narrator feels trapped and unable to resist the system. He is aware of the injustices of colonialism but feels powerless to change them. This internal conflict and his inability to act decisively contribute to the resentment he faces.
* He acts out of fear and pressure: The narrator shoots the elephant primarily out of fear of looking foolish in front of the Burmese crowd. He is not motivated by justice or necessity, but by his own pride and the need to maintain his authority. This act further fuels the hatred directed towards him, as it is seen as a callous and unnecessary act of cruelty.
* He is seen as a hypocrite: The narrator expresses anti-colonial sentiments but ultimately reinforces the system by participating in its brutality. This hypocrisy further fuels the resentment towards him. He is seen as a representative of the very system he criticizes, making him a target of anger.
In conclusion, the narrator in "Shooting an Elephant" is hated because he embodies the oppressive nature of British imperialism. His conflicted emotions, his actions fueled by fear and pressure, and his hypocrisy contribute to the negative image he holds in the eyes of the Burmese people. His story highlights the complex relationship between colonizer and colonized and the moral dilemmas that arise within such power dynamics.