Arguments for the Monster Gaining Humanity:
* Compassion for the De Lacey family: The monster's interactions with the De Lacey family show his ability to feel empathy and love. He learns their language, observes their lifestyle, and genuinely desires to be part of their lives. He even risks his own safety to protect them from harm.
* Mourning for his creator: The monster's grief over Victor's death, though tinged with anger, demonstrates a capacity for emotional depth and complex feelings. He acknowledges Victor's role in his suffering but still mourns his demise.
* Seeking understanding: The monster's final speech to Walton is a plea for understanding and acceptance. He reveals his internal struggles and urges Walton to learn from his experiences, suggesting a desire for connection and a hope for a better future.
Arguments Against the Monster Gaining Humanity:
* Violence and revenge: The monster's acts of murder and violence against Victor and his loved ones, even if driven by pain, highlight a dark side to his nature. He chooses vengeance over peaceful resolution.
* Lack of remorse: The monster's actions, though motivated by his perceived injustice, lack genuine remorse or regret. He justifies his violence and continues to see himself as a victim.
* Final words of despair: His final words to Walton express a sense of defeat and hopelessness, hinting at a deep-seated despair that may not be overcome.
Ultimately, the interpretation of the monster's "humanity" depends on the reader's perspective.
* Some might argue that his capacity for love and empathy, despite his flaws, proves his humanity.
* Others might emphasize his destructive actions and lack of remorse, concluding that he remains a monstrous creature.
The ambiguity of the monster's character, even at the end of the novel, is part of what makes *Frankenstein* such a powerful and enduring work. It raises questions about the nature of humanity, the consequences of our actions, and the potential for redemption.