Arts >> Art >> Performance Art

Which circus or sideshow performer had better have a good insurancxe policy?

This is a tricky question as it depends on what you consider "better" to have insurance for. Here are a few options with different reasons:

High-Risk Acts:

* The Human Cannonball: This act is inherently dangerous, with a high chance of injury. A good insurance policy would cover potential medical bills, lost wages, and even death benefits.

* Sword Swallowers: This act has a high risk of internal injury. Insurance would be crucial for covering potential surgeries and long-term medical care.

* Fire Eaters: While seemingly controlled, fire-eating carries a risk of burns and other injuries. A good insurance policy would cover medical expenses and potential damage to equipment.

Acts with Animal Involvement:

* Animal Trainers: Working with wild animals comes with inherent risks. Insurance would be important to cover potential injuries to the trainer, the animal, or even spectators.

* Elephant Riders: Elephants are large and powerful animals. Insurance would cover injuries to the rider, the elephant, or any damage caused by the animal.

Other Considerations:

* High-Wire Walkers: While not inherently dangerous, the potential for a fall is significant. Insurance would cover medical expenses and potential liability claims.

* Performers with Special Equipment: Acts involving specialized equipment (e.g., tightrope walkers) require specialized insurance coverage to protect against damage or malfunction.

Ultimately, the answer is subjective and depends on your definition of "better". However, any performer involved in a dangerous or risky act would be wise to invest in a comprehensive insurance policy.

Performance Art

Related Categories